THE RELIABILITY OF PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENTS AT HIGH MOUNTAINS -
AMOUNTS IN DEPENDENCE OF INSTRUMENTS AND SITES.
Ingeborg Auer and Wolfgang Schöner
Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, A-1190 Vienna
tel: +43 1 36026 2206
fax: +43 1 36026 72
email: ingeborg.auer@zamg.ac.at
wolfgang.schoener@zamg.ac.at
INTRODUCTION:
A considerable number of papers have been written about the possibilities and even more about the
"inpossibilities" of measuring precipitation at high alpine regions. High wind speeds, low temperatures, a
high percentage of solid precipitation and an increased probability of roar-frost are the limiting factors
for precipitation measurements in such regions.
In Austria three different types of precipitation measuring systems (manned rain gauges,
totalisers -shielded or unshielded, automatic systems) have been in use since many years. The following
investigation focuses on one selected region in the Goldberggruppe / Hohe Tauern and dealing with problems
and intercomparisons of different precipitation measuring systems at the Sonnblick Observatory located on
a mountain top in 3106 m asl.
NETWORK AND INSTRUMENTS
The database of the investigation is shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 respectively. All instruments are
located in a rectangle between 46°40'- 47°30' N and 12°40'-13°15'E.
Table 1:
Precipitation network in the Sonnblick region
Cont. Table 1: Precipitation network in the Sonnblick region
In Auer, 1992 a comparison of the rain gauge South (OS) and the nearby weighing gauge (WG1) showed a
surplus of precipitation for the weighing gauge of 33 mm for a period of three months
(September - November 1991). However, this study clearly showed that this surplus was due to 33 days where
the weighing gauge registered precipitation although there was no precipitation at all. In the meantime
much effort has been undertaken to rise the quality of the measurements. A comparison between the weighing
gauge and the manual gauge for the period January 1998 - September 1999 is shown in Figure 2. During these
17 months the weighing gauge provided reliable results in respect to amount and time resolution. The
correlation coefficients of the daily values between the two gauges exceed 0.7 most of the time
(comp. Fig. 2). There is also a good agreement between weighing gauge and the totaliser TG4
(comp. Fig. 3). The correlation coefficient based on monthly sums between WG1 and TG4 come to r= 0.79 for
the period January 1988 - September 1999. Moreover the measurements of the weighing gauge are able to
confirm the measurements of the totalisers with annual precipitation amounts of 2500 mm.
Figure 2:
Correlation coefficients of daily precipitation sums between the weighing gauge
(WG1) and manned rain gauge (OS) on Sonnblick Observatory (January 1998 -
September 1999)
Figure 3:
Monthly precipitation sums on Sonnblick from January 1988 till September
1999 measured by three different rain gauges.
LONG TERM PRECIPITATION SERIES
In Auer, 1993 a long-term series for grid point 13 deg E and 47 deg N was evaluated from homogenised long
term precipitation series. The deviations to this grid point of some selected stations are shown in Figure
4. Out of these the valley station Bad Gastein fits best to this grid point. On the contrary, the long
term series of rain gauge North (ON) gives a picture far from any reality and unfortunately, cannot be
used for any statistical time series analyses. The rain gauge South (OS), and best of them the totaliser
TG4 seem to provide better results.
Figure 4:
Deviations of single precipitation time series in the Sonnblick region from the
grid point series for GP 13E and 47 N.
CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS
Table 2 shows the correlation coefficients between precipitation series in the Sonnblick region for the
period 1961-1990, split into two profiles north and south of the alpine main crest including the valley
stations which normally show a higher accuracy of the measurements. The highest correlation overall occurs
between TF1 and TF3 between May and September and TG4 and TG5 in the winter season.
The valley station Rauris (profile north) is best correlated to the totalisers TG1 and TG3 from October to
April. Concerning the measurements on the mountain top the totalisers give better results than the two rain gauges. Due to a higher percentage of convective precipitation events the correlation coefficients are in summer smaller than in winter. Nevertheless the totalisers are higher correlated to the valley station than the rain gauges ON and OS.
On the contrary, the valley station Heiligenblut (south profile) shows in winter the best agreement to the
rain gauge on the north side of the observatory. In summer a higher correlation appears to the totalisers
TF1 and TF3 compared to the rain gauge ON.
Table 2:
Correlation matrix for precipitation series at and around Sonnblick
Observatory, 1961-1990 measured by different rain gauges. Values for the
year (January-December), Winter (October - April) and summer (May-
September)
COMPARISONS TO WINTER MASSBALANCE (SNOW WATEREQUIVALENT) MEASUREMENTS AT NEARBY GLACIERS
Since 1986/87 winter mass balance measurements have been carried out on the glacier Goldbergkees
(Schöner, 1995), which may be interpreted as an "independent, external rain gauge". Two of the profiles
Lieslstange und Bockpalfen will be compared with the precipitation measurements on Sonnblick. Lieslstange
is situated a little bit lower, but quite near to the Observatory with an altitude off 3000 m, Bockpalfen
more centralised on Goldbergkees in an altitude of 2680 m asl. Additionally to profiles from the nearby
glacier Wurtenkees (Chemieprofil in 3000 m asl and P5 in 2650 m asl., Auer et al., 1995) are included as
well. Fig.5 shows these comparisons, and Tab.3 lists the correlation coefficients.
Highest correlation values to the winter mass balance measurements on Goldbergkees occur at OS and TG1
followed by TG4 on the mountain top and TG3 Rojacherhütte. The worst representation of the water equivalent
of the accumulated snow on the glacier is given by TG2 and ON. The Chemieprofil correlates best with OS,
P5 with the TG1 Kolm-Saigurn. Besides the correlations also the total amounts are of interest. Inspite of
the high correlation between OS and the accumulated winter snow OS shows a great deficiency. Concerning
precipitation amounts the totalisers provide better results.
Table 3:
Correlation coefficients between precipitation amounts measured by rain gauges
(or totalisers) and estimated from winter mass balance measurements for the
glaciological winter (October - April)
Figure 5:
Time series of precipitation sums during the glaciological winter (October to
April) in the Goldberggruppe estimated by totalisers, ombrometer and winter
mass balance measurements
CONSEQUENCES FOR PRECIPITATION MAPS
Including or excluding the values of totalisers in regard to precipitation maps makes a great difference
in the final outcome by using the same methods of map construction. This was shown in Auer et. al, 2000,
where precipitation maps for the Sonnblick region were computed for the period 1961-1990 using or excluding
the totaliser values. The maps were produced in Arcview, GIS using a Wedge-filter application along the
alpine main ridge..
Below 1500 m altitude only small differences occurred, whereas big differences characterised the alpine
main ridge itself. For the annual precipitation amount the deficiency exceeded more than 1000 mm in the
summit region and higher parts of the northern inclines, the southern region was less affected. The deficit
during summer season exceeded 700 mm.
CONCLUSIONS
The paper intended to compare the results of different methods of precipitation measurements. Advantages as
well as disadvantages of the various instruments were pointed out. For precipitation information with a
high resolution in time the weighing gauge gives the most reliable information. The ombrometer on the
south side of the Sonnblick Observatory provides good correlation results to the independent winter
mass-balance measurements but the total amount of precipitation is underestimated. Totalisers give best
results of monthly amounts, but the time resolution is insufficient.
REFERENCES
Auer, I., 1992: Precipitation Measurements in a high Alpine Region- inter-comparisons of different
measuring systems. TECO 92,WMO/TD No.462, 251-256, Vienna.
Auer, I., 1993: Niederschlagsschwankungen in Österreich seit Beginn der instrumentellen Beobachtungen
durch die Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik. Österr. Beitr. zu Meteorologie und Geophysik,
Heft 7, 73 S , Wien.
Auer, I., R. Böhm, N. Hammer, W. Schöner, T. Wiesinger, W. Winiwarter, 1995: Glaziologische Untersuchungen
im Sonnblickgebiet: Forschungsprogramm Wurtenkees. Österr. Beitr. zu Meteorologie und Geophysik, Heft 12.
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Wien.
Auer, I. und R. Böhm, 1998: Schneepegel und Totalisatoren im Sonnblickgebiet. Jahresbericht des
Sonnblickvereines für die Jahre 1996 und 1997, S 42 - 87, Eigenverlag des Sonnblick-Vereines, Wien.
Auer, I., R. Potzmann, W. Schöner, 2000: Welchen Beitrag leisten Totalisatoren für die Klimaforschung im
Hochgebirge? - gezeigt mit Hilfe des Totalisatorenmessnetzes im Sonnblickgebiet. Jahresbericht des
Sonnblickvereins für die Jahre 1998 und 1999, S 22 - 30, Eigenverlag des Sonnblick-Vereines, Wien.
Schöner, W., 1995: Schadstoffdeposition in einer hochalpinen winterlichen Schneedecke am Beispiel von
Wurtenkees und Goldbergkees (Hohe Tauern). Dissertation Universität Salzburg, Salzburg.
Schöner, W., I. Auer, und R. Böhm, 2000: Klimaänderung und Gletscherverhalten in den Hohen Tauern.
Salzburger Geographische Arbeiten, Bd. 36, Salzburg.
Skoda, G., 1993: Pilotstudie zu I. Korrekturmöglichkeiten von Fehlern bei der Niederschlagsmessung und
II. Möglichkeiten der Bestimmung der Höhenabhängigkeit des Niederschlages, Anhang, Teil E: Erfassung und
Auswertung des Niederschlages. Hydrographisches Zentralbüro im BmfLuF-, Wien.
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, 1999: Bericht über den Sonnblick-Workshop Umweltforschung
im Hochgebirge - Ergebnisse von GAW-DACH und verwandten Projekten, 5. bis 6. Oktober 1999, Wien. Österr.
Beitr. zu Meteorologie und Geophysik Heft 21. Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Wien.